PDA

View Full Version : No changes to NFL Overtime Rules



52decleetzu
03-18-2009, 07:38 PM
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3993657


NFL overtime rules won't change

By John Clayton

After further review, the NFL overtime rules won't change.

NFL competition committee co-chairman Rich McKay, speaking on a national conference call, said there will be no adjustment to the current overtime rules. The committee met for 10 days in Naples, Fla., and after consulting players and conducting a league-wide survey from the 32 clubs, there wasn't enough support to make any proposal to change the current overtime rules, which were created to minimize the chance of ties.

There has been a recent push by fans for each team to have a possession in overtime. Players expressed concerns about safety issues if the current rules are changed. McKay said there has been a growing concern about the increasing number of games decided on the first possession after the overtime coin toss.

Personally I would like to see each team get at least one possession,but apparently the players want as little time on the field as possible.

Im not sure I follow that argument,because the addition of 1 extra drive for the opposing team whenever the first team goes down and scores on the first drive occurs probably a handful of times during the year at most.

Actually there were 15 OT games last year,and there is a 43% chance overall of a team scoring on the first drive to end the game.That is about 7 extra drives out of how many over the course of the season?A LOT.

I know injuries can happen,but they can happen during practice,at home goofing off (Brandon Marshall) or any number of ways.Dont think 7 extra drives relatively speaking raises the injury risk that much.

Dade
03-18-2009, 08:31 PM
Agree with you 52 there isn't any concern for injuries. I would like to see an extra 10 minute period of play. No sudden death.

52decleetzu
03-18-2009, 09:16 PM
Agree with you 52 there isn't any concern for injuries. I would like to see an extra 10 minute period of play. No sudden death.

I just went and looked at a random game and there were 22 drives total.

Doing some quick math thats about 5632 total drives in a 16 week season(if they all averaged 22 per game).Last year if the rule was in place 7 extra drives would be placed on top of that number........or an increase of about .0012 %.

Take that number and divide it to the injury rate per drive-and I think you get the drift.The odds are astronomical for an injury risk argument to be made.

But in negotiations, especially with a union involved you never can "get" something without "giving up" something in return.Maybe instead of 59.5% of the revenue from the league they can give them 59.50012 % next time.

UKRaven
03-19-2009, 04:04 AM
Take that number and divide it to the injury rate per drive-and I think you get the drift.The odds are astronomical for an injury risk argument to be made.


Later on in games do the chances of injury increase?

Why not just have a drawn game? (debate point rather than opinion).

UKRavenStockers
03-19-2009, 07:09 AM
Do away with overtime completely, seriously if they're not going to settle the game properly in overtime by getting all three units from both teams on the field in overtime then don't bother. Just do away with the extra game and bring back ties at the end of regulation.

RavenTD
03-19-2009, 01:05 PM
Thank goodness they didn't change it for Donovan McNabb's sake.

effo5231
03-19-2009, 02:21 PM
I don't understand why people feel like a team's offense deserves to get on the field in overtime.

Defenses get paid, special teamers get paid. If you're ST can't pin a a team deep and if your defense can't... I dunno, defend, why would you deserve to win?

Its really simple, if you want the ball... take it from the other team. As I understand it, the majority of OT games don't end on the first drive anyway.

(Also, what happens if Team A and Team B both score on their first drives? Do we go to sudden death now? That still means that one team will get a chance to score a "walk off" TD or FG. Should we institute the absurd college system? Say goodbye to any meaningful scoring records at that point, imagine two bad D's standing around watching Brady and Palmer throwing 12 TDs each.)

Leave it the way it is... if you want the ball in OT, then your D should go get it for you.

Jeremiah W
03-19-2009, 02:29 PM
I never had a problem with OT. Win the game in regulation if you are not confident in your defense and special teams.

How are they going to get more consistant holding and pass interference rules, and why not expand the rosters a little so your season does not swing on how street free agent Cbs can cover.

RAVENOUS52
03-19-2009, 02:39 PM
I've always thought that the NFL's overtime was fine the way it is, Donovan McNabb notwithstanding.

POPSinPA
03-19-2009, 09:29 PM
Interesting info here.
http://www.advancednflstats.com/2008/10/how-important-is-coin-flip-in-ot.html

Me, I think the rules are fine.

It takes offense and defense to win. Play both and the coin toss in irrelevant.

Mista T
03-19-2009, 11:55 PM
Good -- don't mess with success.

Stealthbirds80
03-23-2009, 09:18 PM
Yeah no need to change it. Defenses get paid to play. Adding more possessions gives more opportunities for the refs to make a terrible call or someones star player to get put out for the year for a week 1 OT thriller.

Rayvens52
03-24-2009, 03:23 PM
I agree I have never had any problems with the current OT rules, I have just wanted to change the rules because the college OT rules are so much more exciting then the NFL's... just my peronal opinion.