PDA

View Full Version : Defensive Notes 9/30/07



Filmstudy
10-02-2007, 12:53 PM
This was a hard game to re-watch for so many reasons. In addition to the result, the game was the first this year not broadcast in HD, making it more difficult than normal to record the players. The pass rush continued its disappearing act. In a game where the Ravens racked up 418 yards, 26 1st downs, and were in Cleveland territory on every drive (except the last when the game ended at their own 26), the offense still managed just 13 points. I’m still hoarse from screaming at the TV set for the no huddle in the 3rd quarter. The Cleveland defense was on the field for 73 plays, the Ravens only 48 (including 2 kneels).

Vs. the Rush: 28 plays for 101 yards, 3.6 YPC excluding the 2 kneels
Vs. the Pass: 18 pass plays for 204 yards,11.3 YPP
Overall: 46 plays for 305 yards, 6.6 YPPA (again excluding the kneels)

By defensive set:
3 DB’s: 4 plays, -1 yards. The Ravens used this 3 safety set (Landry, Reed, Sapp) in goal line situations.
Standard (4 DB’s): 27 plays, 159 yards, 5.9 YPPA, 1 TO
Nickel (5 DB’s): 14 plays, 98 yards, 7.0 YPPA
Dime (6 DB’s): 1 play, 49 yards

By number of pass rushers:
3: 1 play for 6 yards, 6.0
4: 12 plays for 116 yards, 9.7, 1 TO
5: 2 plays for 57 yards, 28.5
6. 2 plays for 25 yards, 12.5
7: 1 play for 0 yards
The Ravens had 0 sacks and only the 1 turnover mentioned above.

Notes:
• As you can see above, nothing worked in the pass rush. The Ravens have now sacked the QB just 1 time in 85 pass plays with Justin Bannan on the field in 2006-07. Thus far in 2007, they are also 0 for 32 with Edwards on the field. The biggest disappointment for the season remains the 4-man pass rush, which has resulted in just 1 sack in 68 pass plays this season.
• The dime, which had been effective to date, was only on the field for 1 play, the 49 yard catch and run by Winslow. In reviewing the down and distance for the 1st half, it’s not tough to see why this happened. The Browns faced 3/1, 3/3, 3/2, 3/3, 3/8, 3/4, and 3/3 in the first Half. In the 2nd half, when the 3rd down distances were longer, the Browns were running out the clock. Antwan Barnes was on the field for just 6 snaps, and Gerome Sapp for only 2 goal-line plays.
• Ronnie Prude was replaced by Martin at NB. Prude did not play well vs. the Cards, as the Ravens allowed 100 yards on 10 plays while in the nickel. Martin followed it up with another forgettable effort (7.0 YPPA in the nickel, 9.8 YPPA). The Ravens need Samari Rolle back both for the outside cover and so Ivy can be moved back to NB.
• The goal line defense with 3 safeties was on the field for 4 plays and effectively stopped the run. Those were the first plays McAlister has missed this season.
• Suggs was replaced by Gary Stills (his first defensive action) for 2 running plays, 17 yards
• Gregg and Ngata were both on the field for 39 of the 46 plays (excluding kneels). Gregg, in particular, could have benefited from another rotational DT. Ngata was again exceptional vs. the run. The Ravens allowed just 52 yards on 23 rushing plays (2.3 YPC) with Ngata in and 5/49 (9.8 YPC) with him out.
• Despite their terrific takeaway total, the 2006 Ravens did not convert every turnover opportunity. However, the 2007 Ravens have now missed at least 4 good chances (Suggs bobbled FR, 2 McAlister near picks, and Scott Sunday). Scott did not even have his hands up for the pick, preferring to focus on the PD when he had the open field.
• Poor kick coverage and Figurs’ fumble allowed the Browns to start with excellent field position (Cle 45, Bal 31) on 2 of their TD drives.


What’s Wrong with the Ravens Pass Rush?

• Right now the Ravens are simply covering for the weakness in the secondary with fewer 5+ man rushes. This is manifested in fewer blitz opportunities for Scott and Johnson.
• Pryce was replaced by Edwards. That was about as big a loss as you can take with 1 player shift. Take a look at Edwards v. the Cardinals. Not only does he have a painfully slow first step, he does not even move the tackle to the outside, creating opportunities for delayed blitzes the Ravens used very effectively last season. The Ravens have 0 sacks in 32 pass plays with Edwards on the field this season.
• Bannan, the other possible replacement is also thoroughly impotent in the pass rush. Despite piling up 66 sacks since the beginning of '06, the Ravens have sacked the QB just 1 time in 85 pass plays with him on the field in his 2 years.
• With Scott not being used that way, the team has really just 2 pass rushers (Suggs and Barnes). I’m defining that as a player that can beat a single blocker a good percentage of the time with some speed. Last year they had 4 (Pryce, Suggs, Thomas, Scott), and those players were on the field every down. Their remaining defensive players, but most prominently Johnson and Ngata are supporting pass rush players. Ngata regularly takes a double, and Johnson often paralyzes 2 defenders with a good first step and hands, even when he subsequently drops to zone coverage. Johnson and Ngata were #1 and #2 in sacks as a % of passing plays in 2006 despite respectively contributing just 1.5 and 1 sack personally.
• Johnson, who might be able to apply pressure as a pure DE, is too valuable at LB to move.
• Every sack this year has been in the dime and a result of confusion/overloads. It should scare the hell out of us that 4 of our 6 sacks have come from DB's. Those sacks are the icing on the cake, but are no substitute for a 4-man pass rush needed to hurry the QB on an every down basis.

festivus
10-02-2007, 12:59 PM
Thanks Filmstudy.

*sniff*

:grbac:

RavenFanatic2k6
10-02-2007, 01:02 PM
I think it's time to end the Edwards experiment. Dude is a complete waste of a roster spot. Would rather see what Barnes or Jones can do out there.

I also agree that the Ravens could use another DT in the rotation. I was surprised when they signed Griesen instead of bringing in a DT. Depending on how healthy Figurs is, it may be a good time to send Cory Ross back down and bring in a fresh DT.

jonboy79
10-02-2007, 01:11 PM
Ngata is showing to be irreplaceable in this D...
I think moving Johnson to replace Edwards is a near must at this point, I think the stepdown from Pryce to Edwards is worse then the double step down of Pryce - Johnson and Johnson - Burgess/Barnes....

When can we expect Pryce and Rolle back? I know we have two more weeks at minimum for Cody and Smith. At this point, I think all 4 would help.

camdenyard
10-02-2007, 01:13 PM
Somebody PLEASE get this over to Rex Ryan STAT. A blocking dummy would have more success than Edwards. :thumbdown:

And cc: Mr. Billick for good measure.

And Tony - you just have GOT to get this guy on staff. This is about as thorough an analysis of a game as I have seen. :thumbup:

Gone64
10-02-2007, 01:27 PM
Damn Filmstudy! How long does it take you to compile all of this info? Great stuff!!:patriot:

Greg
10-02-2007, 01:30 PM
He does it week in and out, I think the Ravens could use him as well. Great stuff as always. Perpetual rack.

ravenwoman
10-02-2007, 05:44 PM
It is apparant to me that not having Trevor Pryce and Adalius Thomas on defense has really crippled us. I cannot analyze 1% as well as Mr. Filmstudy, but anyone can see we have zero on pass rush. This in turn, gives journeymen quarterbacks ample time to complete passes, disect the defense, control the ball, score points, etc., etc.

For the reasons that I have noted, this is the VERY reason why you have to run the ball more on offense. We need to keep our defense OFF the field as much as possible and kill the clock. When Willis M. is running so effectively and probably averaging over 5 yards a carry, we should not be passing the ball the first 8 plays of the game. Billick's play calling is putting us behind the 8 ball every single game. Until our defense "gets well", we can't afford anymore of this foolishness on the part of the offense.

highwater
10-02-2007, 06:23 PM
Filmstudy, extremely stellar work, as usual.

I knew we would miss Pryce as a pass-rushing threat, but I had no idea it would be this bad without him. As Filmstudy astutely pointed out, that's not the only reason for the dropoff in pressure, but really, this is ridiculous. I thought Rex would come up with a scheme to cover up our losses in personnel, but I may have been too optimistic about that. Our lack of pass rush is hurting us badly.

Filmstudy
10-03-2007, 07:26 AM
Thanks for the replies guys.

RavenFanatic2K6,

I could not agree more. I would simply release Edwards at this point. He's now too small to play DT and too slow off the ball (along with other failings) to play DE.

jonboy79,

Cody sure would be a breath of fresh air if he could return healthy. However, since nothing has been said, I'm not expecting him back this season. Does anyone know if he's practicing with the team?

Mike Smith is an inside LB, so I'm not sure how he's going to help. Burgess has got to be ahead of him on the depth chart at this point.

With Pryce hurt now, the move of JJ would really mean an upgrade of Edwards/Bannan to JJ and a single downgrade of JJ to Barnes/Burgess/Jones at OLB. I think we'll see this if Pryce is out for an extended period or if the team drops to 2-4 or 3-5.

Gone64,

I spend about 10-20 hours per week on this. I'm finding it a lot more rewarding and mentally challenging than online poker or computer games.

ravenwoman,

I hadn't thought of it the way you've said it, but it makes sense. The Ravens for the first time since the '90's have to find a way to protect the defense from being on the field. I think they actually did a good job of that vs. the Browns, however, where they had 73 offensive plays to 48 for the Browns.

I'm sure there are some folks here who do not remember the '96 Ravens. They had a virtually unstoppable no-huddle offense led by Vinny, Jackson, and Alexander. However, they had to be careful not to use it very often, because the defense could not stand the pressure of being on the field very long. Lewis was a rookie, Burnett was the only other good defensive player, we had 2 corners that could not cover their own shadow, and the acquisitions of Starks, McAlister, Herring, Boulware, Sharper, Woodson, Siragusa, Adams, and McCrary that built the mighty 2000 unit were all yet to come.